Supported byOwner's Engineer
Clarion Energy banner

Can Serbia build a nuclear power plant amid corruption and doubts?

Supported byClarion Owner's Engineer

Serbia plans to explore nuclear energy with a preliminary study led by French companies EDF and Egis, expected to be completed soon. However, this move raises serious concerns due to the country’s high corruption levels and recent construction scandals involving Egis, notably a fatal incident in Novi Sad where 16 people died.

Critics argue that Egis’s involvement undermines trust, given their history of corrupt practices and suspensions from international projects. Despite this, the Serbian government continues to push forward with nuclear energy plans, sparking public skepticism.

Experts note that very few countries can successfully build nuclear power plants—mostly established nuclear powers like Russia, China, Japan, South Korea, the USA, and France. France itself hasn’t built a new reactor since 1999, raising questions about Serbia’s choice of partners.

Supported by

Building a nuclear plant typically takes around 15 years due to strict safety regulations. The estimated cost is upwards of €10 billion per plant, but nuclear energy remains cheaper than many renewable options and crucial for Serbia’s energy future, especially as coal reserves are limited and Kosovo’s resources are inaccessible.

There are legal concerns about the current study’s legitimacy, as it began before Serbia officially lifted its nuclear construction moratorium. Energy experts emphasize the need for transparent, lawful, and well-planned development involving public consultation and domestic expertise.

Unlike Serbia, neighboring Slovenia and Croatia approach nuclear energy with broader political consensus, public debate, and expert involvement. Slovenia even planned a referendum on nuclear development, though it was canceled amid legal challenges.

In conclusion, while nuclear energy is a strategic necessity for Serbia’s energy security, the current approach—rushed, opaque, and tied to controversial contractors—risks undermining public trust and long-term success. Careful planning, legal compliance, and transparency are essential before committing to such a complex and impactful project.

Supported by

RELATED ARTICLES

Supported byClarion Energy
ElevatePR Serbia
Serbia Energy News
error: Content is protected !!