Labour productivity stalls as skills mismatch becomes a structural constraint

Supported byClarion Owners Engineers

One of the least visible yet most consequential trends in Serbia’s economy is the growing gap between labour availability and labour productivity. Employment levels remained relatively stable through 2025, but productivity gains lagged, reflecting deeper structural issues related to skills mismatch, demographic pressures, and limited investment in human capital aligned with industrial needs.

Serbia’s labour market is tight in specific segments while slack persists in others. Advanced manufacturing, engineering, energy, and ICT face persistent shortages of skilled workers, while lower-productivity services absorb labour without commensurate output gains. This imbalance constrains firms’ ability to scale and discourages investment in higher-value activities that depend on specialized competencies.

Supported byVirtu Energy

Migration compounds the issue. Skilled workers continue to seek opportunities abroad, particularly within the EU, reducing the domestic pool of experienced labour. While remittances support household income, they do not replace lost productivity or innovation capacity. The result is a labour market that appears stable on the surface but is increasingly misaligned with Serbia’s stated industrial ambitions.

Investment weakness reinforces the productivity problem. When gross fixed capital formation grows below one percent in real terms, opportunities for automation, process upgrading, and technological diffusion are limited. Firms compensate by intensifying labour use rather than improving output per worker, a strategy that eventually hits diminishing returns.

This dynamic creates a ceiling on sustainable wage growth. Without productivity gains, rising wages either compress margins or translate into higher prices, undermining competitiveness. Serbia avoided this trap in 2025 largely due to disinflation and cautious wage dynamics, but the underlying risk remains.

Supported byClarion Energy

Addressing productivity is not primarily a matter of labour supply but of alignment. Education, vocational training, and industrial policy must converge around actual demand from manufacturing, energy, and technology sectors. Without that convergence, Serbia risks locking itself into a low-productivity equilibrium where employment persists but convergence stalls.

Supported by

RELATED ARTICLES

spot_img
spot_img
Supported byClarion Energy