Supported byOwner's Engineer
Clarion Energy banner

The Serbian standard is below half of the European average

Supported byspot_img

The consumption of the average Serbian household in 2019 was more than half lower than the average consumption in the European Union.
These data were published by Eurostat, the EU’s statistical agency, according to which the gross domestic product per capita (at purchasing power parity, which takes into account differences in prices between countries) is even further from the EU average and was only 41 percent. According to both indicators, we are at the bottom of the table of European countries, just ahead of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Albania and Northern Macedonia.
Individual consumption is a measure of the material wealth of households, according to a Eurostat statement, while GDP per capita is a measure of economic activity. Although far from the average, and even from the poorest EU countries, this 49 percent is a slight improvement over the previous three years when we were at 48 percent of the European Union average.
Since 2008, we were closest to the average EU consumption in 2012, when the average consumption of our household was exactly half of the EU consumption.
GDP per capita in relation to the European one increased last year and in fact returned to the level from 2013, when it amounted to the same 41 percent of the European Union average. Although modest, it is our best result in the last 12 years since these statistics have been monitored.
The fact that our consumption is at 49% of the EU average indicates the structure of consumption, says Jelena Zarkovic, a professor at the Faculty of Economics in Belgrade.
“It can be concluded that the inhabitants of the EU spend more on luxury goods, and we spend more on basic living needs such as food, drinks, clothes, housing. However, I think that income is a better indicator of consumption as a measure of well-being. For example, unlike the EU, 20% of our workforce works in the informal sector. Also, in our country, there is still natural consumption, ie people produce for themselves, which is also much less in the EU,” notes Zarkovic.
Last year, Serbia recorded a GDP growth of 4.2 percent, while the EU grew at a rate of 1.5 percent. If ambitious plans were realized for our economy to grow faster than the European average in the coming years, it would be logical to assume that the differences in the standard would be reduced. However, Zarkovic points out that it is not only about growth but also the distribution of income.
“If this GDP growth goes to a better part of society, then it does not have to reflect to the same extent on the growth of standards and consumption. If growth goes to new jobs and employment of the poorer part of the population, then it is better for the growth of the overall standard of society,” she says, adding that analyzes based on the Household Budget Survey have appeared, according to which the Gini coefficient, ie the measure of income inequality in one country, is growing, indicating an increase in inequality.
Gini coefficient of Serbia according to the so-called The SILC survey on income and consumption in 2018 was 35.6, which is among the worst in Europe, just behind Bulgaria, which according to this parameter had the highest inequality in income distribution, Danas reports.

Supported by

RELATED ARTICLES

Supported byClarion Energy
spot_img
Serbia Energy News
error: Content is protected !!