Banking sector reacts to proposed interest rate limits: A silent response

The banking sector has been notably quiet in response to the recent announcement by Jorgovanka Tabaković, the re-elected governor of the National Bank of Serbia (NBS). Tabaković revealed plans for significant changes to the Law on the Protection of Users of Financial Services, aiming to impose permanent limits on interest rates for various types of loans, including consumer, cash and overdraft facilities, in addition to housing loans.

This regulatory adjustment, first introduced during the global economic crisis to curb commercial banks’ practices and protect clients, is set to become more stringent. Unlike the current temporary measure, which expires at the end of the year, the new restrictions will be a permanent feature of the regulatory landscape.

While this measure may be politically advantageous and appealing to current and potential borrowers, specific details about the interest rate limits remain unclear. The anticipated restriction might not offer significant relief to debtors, especially if rates are capped at current high levels, with expectations for monetary easing and lower rates in the near future.

Supported by

The lack of response from banks and banking professionals is unusual. Forbes Serbia reached out to major Serbian banks for their comments on the governor’s announcement and its potential impact on their operations but received no replies. This silence could stem from several reasons:

1. Deference to the NBS: Banks might be hesitant to publicly oppose the central bank’s decision out of respect or fear of reprisal.
2. Pre-agreed terms: It’s possible that banks have already negotiated acceptable terms for the interest rate limits with the NBS, ensuring minimal adverse effects on their financial stability.
3. Profit margins: Serbian banks have reported substantial profits, with the sector earning over 800 million euros in 2022 and more than one billion euros in 2023. Given these profits, banks might be prepared to accept reduced margins without significant distress.
4. Strategic silence: Banks may recognize that the proposed measures might not significantly impact their profitability and could enhance their public image by showing support for consumer protection.

Despite the absence of a vocal reaction from the banking sector, the imposition of interest rate limits represents a significant intervention in the free market, where banks typically set rates based on supply and demand. The long-term effects of these changes on the sector’s profitability and operational dynamics will unfold in due course.